Every engineer is shipping agents.No one is governing them.
See every agent. Every action. Every dollar.
One Control Plane to Rule Them All
You can finally answer the 3am question.
One place to see every agent, govern what it can access, and track what it costs.
Sound familiar?
Every engineering org shipping agents is living this.
These aren't tooling problems. They're governance gaps.
Agents need a control plane
Not another framework
A control plane is the layer that manages how agents deploy, what they access, and what happens when something goes wrong.
Your agents run through it, not alongside it.
That's the difference between tools that watch agents and a platform that governs them.
Works with your credentials
Connect the systems your team already uses, like GitHub, Slack, Linear, Jira, and more. Connect to your docs and your internal tools. Use Guild to automate your existing workflows with the systems and tools you already have.
Integration endpoints
CLI$ guild credentials endpoint list acme~github OPERATION METHOD PATH repos_list GET /orgs/{org}/repos repos_get GET /repos/{owner}/{repo} pulls_list GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls pulls_create POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls issues_list GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues issues_create POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues gists_list GET /gists gists_create POST /gists Showing 8 of 42 endpoints
One platform. Four pillars.
Every stage covered. Build, deploy, govern, and share agents — in one control plane.
Build
Any surface you like — SDK, CLI, or UI. Start with production-ready starters from Agent Hub, or scaffold from scratch.
Deploy
Any framework, any model. Guild handles the runtime so you don’t. Event-driven by default — agents run when the world changes.
Govern
This is where most platforms fall short. Guild treats governance as architecture, not a feature.
Share
Stop rebuilding the same agent four times across four teams. Guild treats agents like source code — versioned, forkable, discoverable.
Teams closing the governance gap
See how engineering teams use Guild across support, triage, code review, and internal tools.
Our early work with Guild.ai has been instrumental as we expand how we use AI agents at Turo.
Guild.ai gives us the visibility and governance layer we were missing: a single place to manage how agents interact with our systems, what they can access, and what they cost.
With Guild.ai we now have a structured way to deploy and govern these agents without having to build the management layer ourselves.
Those are monitoring tools — they tell you what happened. Guild is a control plane — it governs what can happen. Monitoring watches agents after the fact. A control plane scopes credentials, enforces policies, and audits every action before anything goes wrong. You run both; they do different jobs.
No. Guild is model-agnostic (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Llama, custom), framework-agnostic (LangChain, CrewAI, Mastra, or roll your own), and vendor-neutral by design. Bring your own integrations via MCP or custom REST. The only thing you commit to is the governance layer.
SOC 2 certification is in progress. Guild ships with sandboxed execution, tenant isolation, scoped credentials (deny-by-default), and immutable audit trails — the architecture that SOC 2 certification formalizes.
No. Bring existing agents as-is. Guild wraps them with the control plane — scoped credentials, audit trail, policy gates — without forcing a rewrite. Your LangChain, CrewAI, or custom TypeScript agents run on Guild without code changes.
Free to start. Starter tier at $199/mo for 1,500 agent automations and 500k tokens. Enterprise is custom (SSO, SCIM, RBAC, audit logs, extended retention, SLAs). Full detail at guild.ai/pricing.
VPC and self-hosted deployment are on the roadmap. Today: Guild runs as a managed cloud service with tenant isolation. Enterprise contracts include extended deployment options — talk to sales if that's a hard requirement.
The complete agent lifecycle.
No credit card required.
